Erkes, Eduard. “Zu Ch’ü
Yüan’s T’ien-wen: Ergänzungen und Berichtigungen zu Conrady-Erkes,
Das älteste Dokument der Kunstgeschichte,” Monumenta Serica
6:273-339 (1941).
Fang, Achilles. “On the
T’ien-wen«Reconstruction» by Prof. Erkes,” Monumenta Serica
7:285-287 (1942).
Field, Stephen. “Cosmos,
Cosmographand the Inquiring Poet: New Answers to the Heaven Questions” in Early
China 17:83-110 (1992).
Field, Stephen. Tian
Wen: A Chinese Book of Origins., New York: New Directions (1986).
Hsü Daolin. “T’ien-wen,
die ‘Himmelsfragen’ des K’üh Yüan,” Sinica 7:204-206
(1932).
Karlgren, Bernhard. “Das
T’ien-wen des K’üh Yüan,” in Orientalische Literaturzeitung
9/10:815-818 (1931).
Mair, Victor H. “Heavenly
Questions” in The Columbia Anthology of Traditional Chinese Literature.
New York: Columbia University (1994).
Major, John. "Some
Questions do have Answers: ‘Tianwen’ and ‘Huainanzi’" in Essays on the
Huainanzi and other Topics in Early Chinese Intellectual History,
Albany: State University of New York Press (forthcoming).
Maspero, Henri. “August
Conrady et Edouard Erkes, Das älteste Dokument zur chinesischen
Kunstgeschichte, T’ien wen,” Journal Asiatique 1-6:61-71
(1933).
Peng Yi 彭毅.
“Chuci tianwen yinyi ji youguan wenti shitan 楚辭天問隱義及有關問題試探”,
Wenshizhe xuebao 文史哲學報24:20-76 (1975).
Wilhelm, Helmut.
“Bemerkungen zur T’ien-wen Frage,” in Monumenta Serica 10:427-432 (1945).
|